- Year Published: 1888
- Language: English
- Country of Origin: England
- Source: Stock, G. W. J. (1888). Deductive Logic. Oxford, England; Pembroke College.
- Flesch–Kincaid Level: 11.0
- Word Count: 1,095
Stock, G. (1888). Part 3: Chapter 8. Deductive Logic (Lit2Go Edition). Retrieved September 28, 2016, from
Stock, George William Joseph. "Part 3: Chapter 8." Deductive Logic. Lit2Go Edition. 1888. Web. <>. September 28, 2016.
George William Joseph Stock, "Part 3: Chapter 8," Deductive Logic, Lit2Go Edition, (1888), accessed September 28, 2016,.
PART III.—OF INFERENCES
Of Mediate Inferences or Syllogisms.
540. A Mediate Inference, or Syllogism, consists of two propositions, which are called the Premisses, and a third proposition known as the Conclusion, which flows from the two conjointly.
541. In every syllogism two terms are compared with one another by means of a third, which is called the Middle Term. In the premisses each of the two terms is compared separately with the middle term; and in the conclusion they are compared with one another.
542. Hence every syllogism consists of three terms, one of which occurs twice in the premisses and does not appear at all in the conclusion. This term is called the Middle Term. The predicate of the conclusion is called the Major Term and its subject the Minor Term.
543. The major and minor terms are called the Extremes, as opposed to the Mean or Middle Term.
544. The premiss in which the major term is compared with the middle is called the Major Premiss.
545. The other premiss, in which the minor term is compared with the middle, is called the Minor Premiss.
546. The order in which the premisses occur in a syllogism is indifferent, but it is usual, for convenience, to place the major premiss first.
547. The following will serve as a typical instance of a syllogism—
Middle term Major term \
Major Premiss. All mammals are warm-blooded | Antecedent
Minor term Middle term | Premisses
Minor Premiss. All whales are mammals /
Minor term Major term \ Consequent or
.'. All whales are warm-blooded > Conclusion.
548. The reason why the names ‘major, ‘middle’ and ‘minor’ terms were originally employed is that in an affirmative syllogism such as the above, which was regarded as the perfect type of syllogism, these names express the relative quantity in extension of the three terms.
549. It must be noticed however that, though the middle term cannot be of larger extent than the major nor of smaller extent than the minor, if the latter be distributed, there is nothing to prevent all three, or any two of them, from being coextensive.
550. Further, when the minor term is undistributed, we either have a case of the intersection of two classes, from which it cannot be told which of them is the larger, or the minor term is actually larger than the middle, when it stands to it in the relation of genus to species, as in the following syllogism—
All Negroes have woolly hair.
Some Africans are Negroes.
.’. Some Africans have woolly hair.
551. Hence the names are not applied with strict accuracy even in the case of the affirmative syllogism; and when the syllogism is negative, they are not applicable at all: since in negative propositions we have no means of comparing the relative extension of the terms employed. Had we said in the major premiss of our typical syllogism, ‘No mammals are cold-blooded,’ and drawn the conclusion ‘No whales are cold-blooded,’ we could not have compared the relative extent of the terms ‘mammal’ and ‘cold-blooded,’ since one has been simply excluded from the other.
552. So far we have rather described than defined the syllogism. All the products of thought, it will be remembered, are the results of comparison. The syllogism, which is one of them, may be so regarded in two ways—
(1) As the comparison of two propositions by means of a third.
(2) As the comparison of two terms by means of a third or middle term.
553. The two propositions which are compared with one another are the major premiss and the conclusion, which are brought into connection by means of the minor premiss. Thus in the syllogism above given we compare the conclusion ‘All whales are warm-blooded’ with the major premiss ‘All mammals are warm-blooded,’ and find that the former is contained under the latter, as soon as we become acquainted with the intermediate proposition ‘All whales are mammals.’
554. The two terms which are compared with one another are of course the major and minor.
555. The syllogism is merely a form into which our deductive inferences may be thrown for the sake of exhibiting their conclusiveness. It is not the form which they naturally assume in speech or writing. Practically the conclusion is generally stated first and the premisses introduced by some causative particle as ‘because,’ ‘since,’ ‘for,’ &c. We start with our conclusion, and then give the reason for it by supplying the premisses.
556. The conclusion, as thus stated first, was called by logicians the Problema or Quaestio, being regarded as a problem or question, to which a solution or answer was to be found by supplying the premisses.
557. In common discourse and writing the syllogism is usually stated defectively, one of the premisses or, in some cases, the conclusion itself being omitted. Thus instead of arguing at full length
All men are fallible,
The Pope is a man,
.’. The Pope is fallible,
we content ourselves with saying ‘The Pope is fallible, for he is a man,’ or ‘The Pope is fallible, because all men are so’; or perhaps we should merely say ‘All men are fallible, and the Pope is a man,’ leaving it to the sagacity of our hearers to supply the desired conclusion. A syllogism, as thus elliptically stated, is commonly, though incorrectly, called an Enthymeme. When the major premiss is omitted, it is called an Enthymeme of the First Order; when the minor is omitted, an Enthymeme of the Second Order; and when the conclusion is omitted an Enthymeme of the Third Order.